Being a bike rider, most of us come up with various confusion
while choosing a bike of our needs. Two-wheelers in Nepal are available in wide
range of varieties. They differ in Price and Specification and most of the riders
get confused while choosing one. Thus, to ease our rider, we have compared
every minor detail component that a Pulsar NS200 and Apache RTR 200 4V constitutes
of. If you are finding it hard to decide, we hope these specification review
will help you choose wise.
|
Bike |
Pulsar NS200 |
Apache RTR 200 4V |
|
Company |
Bajaj Auto Limited |
TVS Motor Company |
|
Price |
NPR 3,60,900 |
NPR 3,39,900 |
|
Engine
type |
4-stroke, 4-valve, liquid-cooled |
4-stroke, Oil-cooled |
|
Engine
Displacement |
199.5 cc |
197.75 cc |
|
Max Power |
24.5 PS@9750rpm |
20.82 PS@9000rpm |
|
Max Torque |
18.5 Nm@8000rpm |
17.25 Nm@7250rpm |
|
No of
Cylinders |
1 |
1 |
|
Valve per
Cylinders |
4 |
4 |
|
Bore |
72 mm |
66 mm |
|
Stroke |
49 mm |
57.8 mm |
|
Front
brake |
Disc |
Disc |
|
Front
brake size |
300 mm |
270 mm |
|
Rear brake
|
Disc |
Disc |
|
Rear brake
size |
230 mm |
240 mm |
|
Transmission |
6 Speed Manual |
5 Speed Manual |
|
Fuel Tank |
12 Ltrs. |
12 Ltrs. |
|
Reserve
Fuel Capacity |
2 Ltrs. |
2.5 ltrs. |
|
Mileage |
40 Kmpl |
50 Kmpl |
|
Front Wheel |
17 Inch. |
17 Inch. |
|
Rear Wheel |
17 Inch. |
17 Inch. |
|
Front Tyre |
100/80 52 P Tubeless |
90/90 49P Tubeless |
|
Rear Tyre |
130/70 62 P Tubeless |
130/70 62 P Tubeless |
|
Kerb
Weight |
156 kg |
153 kg |
|
Length |
2017
mm |
2050 mm |
|
Width |
804 mm |
790 mm |
|
Height |
1075 mm |
1050 mm |
|
Wheelbase |
1363 mm |
1353 mm |
|
Ground
clearance |
168 mm |
180 mm |
|
Seat
height |
805 mm |
800 mm |
|
Start type
|
Self-Start only |
Self-Start only |
|
Speedometer |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Tachometer |
Analogue |
Digital |
|
Mobile App |
No |
Yes |
|
GPRS Navigation |
No |
Yes |
|
Top Speed |
136 Kmph |
127 Kmph |
|
Riding
Range |
420 Km |
444 Km |
The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 costs higher than the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. In terms of the price that you have to pay on a purchase, if you are a cost-effective rider, the RTR 200 4V is a bit more cost efficient than the NS 200 in terms of the mileage and additional features. Mobile app connectivity and GPRS navigation features are actually very cool features in today’s context that RTR 200 has integrated but NS200 failed to provide. Some other features of the RTR 200 4V are its Glide Through Technology, Crash Alert System, Wave Bite Key, Race Derived O3C Engine, etc. Nevertheless, opinions might vary as price may not be as important to some people but the brand can definitely be. The name Pulsar itself can be worth the price for some people and so does the service centers.
Please feel free to leave your comments on
which bike you prefer more.
PREVIOUS NEWS